Trial · 试用申请AI makes identifying gaps easier.
Trial applicationAI makes identifying gaps easier.
申请试用 ai4gap
Apply for an ai4gap trial
ai4gap 用 12 个 Agent 把某个研究方向的近三年文献读成结构化证据，跨文献融合后指出还没人做过的缺口，并交付每个数字都能回溯到原文的综述。申请通过后我们会按你的方向开通一次真实试用。
ai4gap uses 12 Agents to read three years of literature in a given field into structured evidence, fuses it across papers to point out gaps nobody has filled yet, and delivers a review where every number traces back to its source. Once your application is approved we open one real trial run for your field.
🎯 无 gap，不研究；无 gap，不发文。找不到研究空白？提交你的专业与研究方向，我们帮你挖掘有据可依、可写作的研究缺口。
🎯 No gap, no research. No gap, no papers. Stuck finding a gap? Share your field and research focus — we will help you uncover an evidence-backed gap worth writing.
Application
填写申请
Fill in your application
带 * 的是必填项。我们只用这些信息联系你、判断要不要开通试用，不做别的用途，也不会转给第三方。Fields marked with * are required. We use this information only to contact you and decide whether to open a trial — nothing else, and never shared with third parties.
能做什么 / 不能做什么
What we can and cannot do
已经跑通的是「一条流水线」：千篇级语料 → 解析抽取 → 知识融合 → Research Gap → 可溯源综述。试用给的是这条线在你自己方向上的真实产物，不是一段演示视频。
What is already running is one pipeline: ~1,000-paper corpus → parsing and extraction → knowledge fusion → research gaps → traceable review. The trial gives you real artifacts from that line in your own field, not a demo video.
- 给：缺口清单（带证据强度与优先级）、知识图谱、综述底稿、评测口径。
- 不给：编造的文献。核验不过的数字宁可不显示 —— 零虚假引用是硬约束。
- 需要你：一个明确的研究方向与大致文献范围，越具体越容易判断能不能开。
- We give: a gap list (with evidence strength and priority), a knowledge graph, a review draft and the evaluation criteria.
- We do not give: fabricated literature. Numbers that fail verification are simply not shown — zero fabricated citations is a hard constraint.
- We need from you: one clear research field and an approximate literature scope. The more specific, the easier it is to judge feasibility.
当前在跑的方向
Fields currently running
同一套流水线，换方向就是换一份语料与一套领域字段。
The same pipeline: change the field and you change the corpus and the domain fields.
- 材料 · 氢能储运装备（在跑）Materials · hydrogen storage & transport equipment (running)
- 电梯断轴次声波诊断（在跑）Elevator shaft-fracture infrasound diagnosis (running)
- 管理科学Management science
- 药学Pharmaceutical sciences
- 化学Chemistry
- 新能源New energy
- 传统行业Traditional industries
其他方向也可以申请：先在申请里写清方向，我们按现有流水线评估能否迁移。
Other fields can apply too: describe the field in the form and we will assess whether the existing pipeline transfers.
Steps
申请之后会发生什么
What happens after you apply
四步，没有黑盒。
Four steps, no black box.
1提交申请Submit the application
填方向、单位与用途。必填项就那几个 —— 我们只需要判断「这个方向能不能开」。
Field, organisation, use case. Only a few fields are required — we just need to judge whether this field can run.
2邮件确认Email confirmation
1–3 个工作日回复，确认语料范围、字段口径与期望产出；不合适也会直说，不吊着。
We reply within 1–3 business days to confirm corpus scope, field definitions and expected outputs; if it does not fit, we say so plainly.
3跑一次真实试用One real trial run
按你的方向取语料、过四道门，产出缺口清单 + 图谱 + 综述底稿，附数据版本与评测口径。
We pull the corpus for your field, clear all four gates, and produce a gap list + graph + review draft with the data version and evaluation criteria attached.
4一起看结果Review the results together
逐条过缺口清单：哪些撑得住、哪些证据不足。可溯源的部分留着，撑不住的部分当场标出来。
We walk the gap list entry by entry: which ones hold up and which lack evidence. What is traceable stays; what does not hold up is flagged on the spot.
Scope
适用领域
Fields we cover
构效关系与证据密度是这套流水线的通用语言，所以方向可以换。
Structure–activity relations and evidence density are the common language of this pipeline, so the field can change.
📈管理科学Management science
理论边界、实证矛盾、场景空白、构念与变量缺口 —— 从经管/公管文献里找「结论互相打架」的地方。
Theoretical boundaries, conflicting empirical results, uncovered contexts, construct and variable gaps — finding where conclusions in the management and public-administration literature contradict each other.
💊药学Pharmaceutical sciences
母核取代位点、靶点机制争议、制剂递送与毒理盲区；未探索分子空间的定位。
Substitution sites on the core scaffold, disputes over target mechanisms, formulation-delivery and toxicology blind spots; locating unexplored molecular space.
⚗️化学Chemistry
底物 / 催化剂组合空白、机理争议、条件—产率规律；还没被合成表征的候选。
Uncovered substrate / catalyst combinations, mechanistic disputes, condition–yield regularities; candidates that have not been synthesised and characterised yet.
🧱材料Materials
组分构效、结构—性能未知规律、制备工艺局限、性能权衡瓶颈。当前主力方向。
Composition–property relations, unknown structure–performance laws, processing limits, performance trade-off bottlenecks. Our main field today.
🔋新能源New energy
界面演化与阻抗、衰减机理的结论冲突、材料改性空白、实验室到工程化的落差。
Interface evolution and impedance, conflicting conclusions on degradation mechanisms, gaps in materials modification, and the lab-to-engineering gap.
🏭传统行业Traditional industries
配方比例、工况参数、能耗与环保改良方向，以及缺底层机理解释的工艺现象。
Formulation ratios, operating parameters, energy and environmental improvement directions, and process phenomena that lack a mechanistic explanation.